Zomato CEO Deepinder Goyal’s recent job posting for a Chief of Staff has sparked a heated debate across social media. The role, as described, is unpaid for the first year and requires candidates to contribute ₹20 lakh upfront, which will be donated to Zomato’s non-profit arm, Feeding India. Goyal emphasized that he’s looking for someone with empathy, common sense, and a learning mindset, untainted by corporate baggage or entitlement. While the role promises a salary exceeding ₹50 lakh from the second year, this unconventional demand has drawn mixed reactions, with some praising its ingenuity and others calling it elitist.

Critics argue that this financial barrier effectively excludes candidates without substantial financial backing, favoring the privileged over talented aspirants from less affluent backgrounds. Social media users have labeled the move as tone-deaf, with one remarking, “Asking ₹20 lakh filters out anyone who isn’t already rich.” Others questioned its fairness, pointing out that the requirement undermines Zomato’s ethos of inclusivity. Many also highlighted how this approach alienates potential talent by limiting opportunities to a select few capable of meeting such an unusual demand.

Supporters, however, view the move as a clever strategy to attract ambitious, high-risk-tolerant individuals who are deeply invested in their professional growth. They argue that the upfront payment serves as a filter for passion and entrepreneurial spirit, ensuring only the most committed candidates apply. By linking the contribution to charity and promising a lucrative payoff in year two, Goyal has de-risked the proposition for Zomato while framing it as an opportunity to test leadership and perseverance. Whether this strategy proves innovative or exclusionary, it has certainly stirred a critical conversation about privilege, ambition, and modern hiring practices.

Author: Sonali Kamble